Women in cardiovascular imaging: a call for action to address ongoing challenges.

AIMS: The EACVI Scientific Initiatives Committee and the EACVI women's taskforce conducted a global survey to evaluate the barriers faced by women in cardiovascular imaging (WICVi). METHODS AND RESULTS: In a prospective international survey, we assessed the barriers faced at work by WICVi. Three hundred fourteen participants from 53 countries responded. The majority were married (77%) and had children (68%), but most reported no flexibility in their work schedule during their pregnancy or after their maternity leave. More than half of the women reported experiencing unconscious bias (68%), verbal harassment (59%), conscious bias (51%), anxiety (70%), lack of motivation (60%), imposter syndrome (54%), and burnout (61%) at work. Furthermore, one in five respondents had experienced sexual harassment, although this was rarely reported formally. The majority reported availability of mentorship (73%), which was mostly rated as 'good' or 'very good'. While more than two-thirds of respondents (69%) now reported being well trained and qualified to take on leadership roles in their departments, only one-third had been afforded that opportunity. Despite the issues highlighted by this survey, >80% of the participating WICVi would still choose cardiovascular imaging if they could restart their career. CONCLUSION: The survey has highlighted important issues faced by WICVi. While progress has been made in areas such as mentorship and training, other issues including bullying, bias, and sexual harassment are still widely prevalent requiring urgent action by the global cardiovascular imaging community to collectively address and resolve these challenges.

Assessing and Addressing Social Determinants of Cardiovascular Health: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Social determinants of health (SDOH) are the social conditions in which people are born, live, and work. SDOH offers a more inclusive view of how environment, geographic location, neighborhoods, access to health care, nutrition, socioeconomics, and so on are critical in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. SDOH will continue to increase in relevance and integration of patient management, thus, applying the information herein to clinical and health systems will become increasingly commonplace. This state-of-the-art review covers the 5 domains of SDOH, including economic stability, education, health care access and quality, social and community context, and neighborhood and built environment. Recognizing and addressing SDOH is an important step toward achieving equity in cardiovascular care. We discuss each SDOH within the context of cardiovascular disease, how they can be assessed by clinicians and within health care systems, and key strategies for clinicians and health care systems to address these SDOH. Summaries of these tools and key strategies are provided.

Locking the Revolving Door: Racial Disparities in Cardiovascular Disease.

Racial disparities in cardiovascular disease are unjust, systematic, and preventable. Social determinants are a primary cause of health disparities, and these include factors such as structural and overt racism. Despite a number of efforts implemented over the past several decades, disparities in cardiovascular disease care and outcomes persist, pervading more the outpatient rather than the inpatient setting, thus putting racial and ethnic minority groups at risk for hospital readmissions. In this article, we discuss differences in care and outcomes of racial and ethnic minority groups in both of these settings through a review of registries. Furthermore, we explore potential factors that connote a revolving door phenomenon for those whose adverse outpatient environment puts them at risk for hospital readmissions. Additionally, we review promising strategies, as well as actionable items at the policy, clinical, and educational levels aimed at locking this revolving door.

It Takes a Village: Expanding Women's Cardiovascular Care to Include the Community as well as Cardiovascular and Primary Care Teams.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Our aim is to highlight some of the current issues that prevent women from getting sex-specific and gender-specific cardiovascular care and provide recommendations for new approaches and delivery models to improve cardiovascular care for all women. RECENT FINDINGS: Cardiovascular disease remains the number one cause of death for women in the US. Many women remain unaware of cardiovascular risk factors and many healthcare providers who care for women are also poorly informed and feel ill prepared to assess women for cardiovascular risk. Women's Heart Centers have tried to bridge the gaps in women's care between primary care and cardiology. Many of the impediments to care in the current models are lack of comprehensive care and socioeconomic societal limitations. New models of care and delivery are essential to change cardiovascular outcomes for all women, especially women at high risk.

Socioeconomic characteristics of African American women attending community blood pressure screenings.

Study objective: To examine the associations of education and income and blood pressure (BP) in a socioeconomically diverse cohort of African-American (AA) women attending community BP screenings. Design setting and participants: This cross-sectional analysis used data from AA women (n = 972) 53 ± 14 years, enrolled between 2015 and 2019 in the 10,000-women hypertension community screening project in the metropolitan Atlanta area. OLS linear regression were used to examine the associations between SES (education and income) and BP after adjusting for age, body mass index (BMI), smoking, and lipids. Main outcomes and measures: Outcomes were systolic and diastolic BP (SBP, DBP). Measures of SES included education [high school ≤(HS), some college, and ≥college] and income-[<$24,000, $24,000-<$48,000, $48,000-$96,000, and ≥$96,000]. Sociodemographics, health history, anthropometrics and point of care non-fasting lipids were obtained. Results: Compared to women earning <$24,000, an income of ≥$96,000 (ß = -5.7 mmHg, 95% CI: -9.9, -1.5, p = .01) was associated with a lower SBP in the minimally adjusted model. Subsequent adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors attenuated the association and was no longer significant. College and above versus ≤HS education was associated with a higher DBP in the minimally (ß = 2.7 mmHg, 95% CI: 0.2, 5.2, p = .03) and fully adjusted models (ß = 3.4 mmHg, 95% CI: 0.2, 6.5, p = .04). Conclusion: Income of ≥$96,000 was associated with a lower SBP while a college and above education was associated with a higher DBP. Findings underscore the need for increased cardiovascular risk awareness and education targeting higher SES AA women attending community BP screenings.

In-Hospital Complications in Pregnancies Conceived by Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Background Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has emerged as a common treatment option for infertility, a problem that affects an estimated 48 million couples worldwide. Advancing maternal age with increasing prepregnancy cardiovascular risk factors, such as chronic hypertension, obesity, and diabetes, has raised concerns about pregnancy complications associated with ART. However, in-hospital complications following pregnancies conceived by ART are poorly described. Methods and Results To assess the patient characteristics, obstetric outcomes, vascular complications and temporal trends of pregnancies conceived by ART, we analyzed hospital deliveries conceived with or without ART between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2016, from the United States National Inpatient Sample database. We included 106 248 deliveries conceived with ART and 34 167 246 deliveries conceived without ART. Women who conceived with ART were older (35 versus 28 years; P<0.0001) and had more comorbidities. ART-conceived pregnancies were independently associated with vascular complications (acute kidney injury: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.52; 95% CI 1.99-3.19; and arrhythmia: aOR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.46-1.86), and adverse obstetric outcomes (placental abruption: aOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.41-1.74; cesarean delivery: aOR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.33-1.43; and preterm birth: aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.20-1.32), including in subgroups without cardiovascular disease risk factors or without multifetal pregnancies. Higher hospital charges ($18 705 versus $11 983; P<0.0001) were incurred compared with women who conceived without ART. Conclusions Pregnancies conceived by ART have higher risks of adverse obstetric outcomes and vascular complications compared with spontaneous conception. Clinicians should have detailed discussions on the associated complications of ART in women during prepregnancy counseling.

Cardiovascular Disease in Women Update: Ischemia, Diagnostic Testing, and Menopause Hormone Therapy.

OBJECTIVE: This update will address 3 areas specifically that are essential to improving cardiovascular outcomes for women. METHODS: The current literature has been reviewed and three important areas of cardiovascular care in women are highlighted. First is that even though women and men share many traditional risk factors for ischemic heart disease, several of these risk factors affect women disproportionately when it comes to CVD risk and events. There are also unique sex-specific risk factors for women and risk factors that are more common in women than in men. Adverse outcomes of pregnancy and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are associated with an increased long-term risk of CVD and events. At menopause, cardiovascular risks increase, and lipids become unfavorable. Second is that diagnostic testing for ischemic heart disease presents different specificities and sensitivities between men and women and testing should be determined according to what is best and safest for women. Third is that currently, menopause hormone therapy is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of vasomotor and genitourinary symptoms, prevention of osteoporosis, and estrogen replacement in the setting of surgical menopause, hypogonadism, or premature ovarian insufficiency. It is not recommended for the primary or secondary prevention of CVD and not recommended for women with high atherosclerotic CVD risk. RESULTS: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the most common cause of death in women in the United States despite tremendous improvements in cardiovascular care for men and women. The prevention of CVD in women with early detection and implementation of preventive therapies before atherosclerotic CVD develops is critical to improving outcomes for women.

In-Hospital Complications in Pregnant Women With Current or Historical Cancer Diagnoses.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the temporal trends, characteristics and comorbidities, and in-hospital cardiovascular and obstetric complications and outcomes of pregnant women with current or historical cancer diagnosis at the time of admission for delivery. METHODS: We analyzed delivery hospitalizations with or without current or historical cancer between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2014, from the US National Inpatient Sample database. RESULTS: We included 43,132,097 delivery hospitalizations with no cancer, 39,118 with current cancer, and 67,336 with historical diagnosis of cancer. The 5 most common types of current cancer were hematologic, thyroid, cervical, skin, and breast cancer. Women with current and historical cancer were older (29 years and 32 years vs 27 years) and incurred higher hospital costs ($4131 and $4078 vs $3521) compared with women without cancer. Most of the cancer types were associated with preterm birth (hematologic: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.48 [95% CI, 1.35 to 1.62]; cervical: aOR, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.32 to 1.63]; breast: aOR, 1.93 [95% CI, 1.72 to 2.16]). Current hematologic cancer was associated with the highest risk of peripartum cardiomyopathy (aOR, 12.19 [95% CI, 7.75 to 19.19]), all-cause mortality (aOR, 6.50 [95% CI, 2.22 to 19.07]), arrhythmia (aOR, 3.82 [95% CI, 2.04 to 7.15]), and postpartum hemorrhage (aOR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.11 to 1.54]). Having a current or historical cancer diagnosis did not confer additional risk for stillbirth; however, metastases increased the risk of maternal mortality and preterm birth. CONCLUSION: Women with a current or historical diagnosis of cancer at delivery have more comorbidities compared with women without cancer. Clinicians should communicate the risks of multisystem complications to these complex patients.

Cardiovascular risk in menopausal women and our evolving understanding of menopausal hormone therapy: risks, benefits, and current guidelines for use.

Women are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared with men. While traditional risk factors for CVD seem to disproportionately affect women and contribute to this disparity, increased prevalence of CVD at midlife calls into question the contribution of menopause. Given the potential role that declining hormone levels play in this transition, menopause hormone therapies (MHT) have been proposed as a strategy for risk factor reduction. Unfortunately, trials have not consistently shown cardiovascular benefit with use, and several describe significant risks. Notably, the timing of hormone administration seems to play a role in its relative risks and benefits. At present, MHT is not recommended for primary or secondary prevention of CVD. For women who may benefit from the associated vasomotor, genitourinary, and/or bone health properties of MHT, CVD risks should be taken into account prior to administration. Further research is needed to assess routes, dosing, and formulations of MHT in order to elucidate appropriate timing for administration. Here, we aim to review both traditional and sex-specific risk factors contributing to increased CVD risk in women with a focus on menopause, understand cardiovascular effects of MHT through a review of several landmark clinical trials, summarize guidelines for appropriate MHT use, and discuss a comprehensive strategy for reducing CV risk in women.

Women in Cardiology Twitter Network: An Analysis of a Global Professional Virtual Community From 2016 to 2019.

Background Social media is an effective channel for the advancement of women physicians; however, its use by women in cardiology has not been systematically studied. Our study seeks to characterize the current Women in Cardiology Twitter network. Methods and Results Six women-specific cardiology Twitter hashtags were analyzed: #ACCWIC (American College of Cardiology Women in Cardiology), #AHAWIC (American Heart Association Women in Cardiology), #ilooklikeacardiologist, #SCAIWIN (Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Women in Innovations), #WomeninCardiology, and #WomeninEP (Women in Electrophysiology). Twitter data from 2016 to 2019 were obtained from Symplur Signals. Quantitative and descriptive content analyses were performed. The Women in Cardiology Twitter network generated 48 236 tweets, 266 180 903 impressions, and 12 485 users. Tweets increased by 706% (from 2083 to 16 780), impressions by 207% (from 26 755 476 to 82 080 472), and users by 440% (from 796 to 4300), including a 471% user increase internationally. The network generated 6530 (13%) original tweets and 43 103 (86%) amplification tweets. Most original and amplification tweets were authored by women (81% and 62%, respectively) and women physicians (76% and 52%, respectively), with an increase in original and amplification tweets authored by academic women physicians (98% and 109%, respectively) and trainees (390% and 249%, respectively) over time. Community building, professional development, and gender advocacy were the most common tweet contents over the study period. Community building was the most common tweet category for #ACCWIC, #AHAWIC, #ilooklikeacardiologist, #SCAIWIN, and #WomeninCardiology, whereas professional development was most common for #WomeninEP. Conclusions The Women in Cardiology Twitter network has grown immensely from 2016 to 2019, with women physicians as the driving contributors. This network has become an important channel for community building, professional development, and gender advocacy discussions in an effort to advance women in cardiology.

Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Younger Black Women: Results from the 10,000 Women Community Screening Project.

Background: Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) risk factors are prevalent in black women, but when these risk factors arise is not clear. We aimed to determine when obesity, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia appear in black women within a community screening program. Methods: 945 black women who enrolled in the 10,000 Women community screening project in the metro Atlanta area were included (2015-2018). Socioeconomic, lifestyle, and traditional CVD risk factor information was patient-reported and measured. Characteristics of three cohorts stratified by age, 20-39 years old (yo), 40-59 yo, and ≥60 yo, were compared using pairwise analysis. Results: All cohorts had class 1 obesity. Mean systolic blood pressure was higher in older cohorts [20-39 yo: 122 ± 15; 40-59 yo: 133 ± 19; ≥60 yo: 142 ± 20 mmHg; p < 0.001]. All age groups had mean total cholesterol levels below 200 mg/dL and were lowest in women 20-39 yo, (p < 0.001). All age groups had mean LDL levels below 100 mg/dL and were highest in women 20-39 yo, (p < 0.01). All age groups had mean HDL levels greater than 50 mg/dL and were highest in women ≥60 yo, (p-value = 0.03). A higher proportion of ≥60 yo limited salt intake, (p ≤ 0.001), and ate fast food less than three times a week, (p < 0.001), compared to younger women. Conclusion: We report that CVD risk factors, like elevated blood pressure and obesity, are prevalent at young ages in black women, which could be due to lifestyle practices. Earlier initiation of CVD preventive care in black women could be beneficial; however, this needs to be studied further.